Wicked Covergirls (Wicked, 98)
Starring: Serenity, Missy, Stephanie Swift, Asia Carrera, Jill Kelly, Roxanne Hall, Ruby, Sydnee Steele, Azlea Antistia, Charlie, Petra, Rebecca Lord, Antonia and Raylene
Directed By: Brad Armstrong
Rating is on a scale of 1-5. 1 being poor, 3 being average, and 5 being exceptional. For an explanation of the review criteria, click here
- OVERALL: * * *
- SEX: * *
- ACTING: * *
- SCRIPT: * * *
- J.O.P.: * * *
- FAST-FORWARDING: * *
- EDITING: * * * *
This was a somewhat interesting concept, as porn concepts go anyway..... lesbian sex scenes built into "modeling assignments" like fake commercials, fashion shows, and music videos. Actually, it's kind of silly now that I think about it, models that all of a sudden get carried away and start eating each others twats.... Ok anyway, I must admit I actually kind of liked this one regardless. I'm generally hetero, mind you, so probably would have enjoyed it a bit more if I was in possession of a penis (well, a flesh one anyway heh) I don't mind lesbian scenes sprinkled throughout a video, they're stimulating in an auto-erotic sort of way, but after a while they get boring. I might as well masturbate while looking in a mirror. I'll be the first to admit that the
female body is generally more attractive than the male body, but after watching all those boobs for a half hour I was craving some dick, just for a change of scenery. Vibrators and dildos are fun, but I can play with all that stuff here in my crypt instead of watching someone else do it. I do have a pretty bad voyeurism problem though so every time I put this movie on I found myself getting hot anyway *blushes*
Enough said about that. If you dig all girl flicks, and slightly artsy porn, you'll probably dig this one. Overall I would rate it average. It elicited an "eh" sort of feeling from me......Not bad, but not something I would put on in favor of something with more variety. Yeah I broke out the AA batteries during the screening of this one, but hey, you can only watch girls playing with themselves for so long before getting naughty ideas of your own.... I do tend to have an incredibly short attention span, so while the content bored me after a while, the jerky editing kept me amused (particularly as a former video student). A few well hung young studs throw into the mix would have made me a happy girl. The girls were mostly attractive, I'd let them give me head....heh.....something which they seemed to enjoy thoroughly throughout the video. The small acting bits were pretty bad, but thankfully pretty scarce. I think they should have been left out, they detracted from the overall flow.
As for the sex itself, I found all the posing and strutting around tiresome, and the rest was basically variations on girls eating each other out and fingering each other in various configurations. I fast forwarded (with my brand new universal remote.yay) through most of the posing at the beginning of the scenes. Damn, I see titties every morning when I get in the shower......I suppose some guys may like this, but I have a feeling they'd rather just dispense with the pleasantries and get down to the fucking......or finger fucking in this case...... - Supreme Goddess
Review Key:Reviewed on a scale of 1-5 stars. OVERALL, SCRIPT, EDITING - self explanatory. SEX - the amount and quality of. ACTING - can be actually good, or good in a bad way, in the sense that it is so bad it is entertaining. J.O.P. - Jerk-Off Potential. FAST-FORWARDING - the urge to hit that FF button, be it during dialog, rehashed sex-scenes, whatever. The more stars, the less fast-forwarding. EDITING - somewhat related to fast forwarding. Do they show a ball shot for too long? The same angle for an eternity?
Contents | Music Reviews | Porno Reviews | Music Interviews | Porn Interviews | Live Reviews | Porn Gossip | Editorials | Mailing List | About Us | Contact Information & Our Policy | Playlists | Links | Back Issues/Archives Unchain the Underground
Contact us via email